Wednesday, 24 July 2013

A theory on the meaning of life

**NOTE** This isn't part of this blog's usual post style, because in actual fact it's a totally separate thing I wanted to post, I just didn't want to create a new account!**

Oh, humans.   Megan and I have been thinking recently about how destructive they are, about how we seem to just wreak havoc on nature rather than fully contribute to it.  We don’t seem to have a place in it, either.  We’ve been watching a lot of David Attenborough recently, and noticed every animal has a place in the world, it contributes to the life cycle of the ecosystem.  But humans aren’t a cog, they are right up there at the top of the food chain.

When discussing this theory, we said “at the top of the food chain” in harmony as we reached that thought together.  This kind of psychic connection, that is surprisingly common among close friends and family and yet strangely unspoken of in a wider societal context, is so uncommon of other animals.  Yes, many animal species do display groups of them working synonymously with each other through seemingly psychic connections, but it isn’t the same.  I’ve never seen an animal mentalist; no squirrel with a fully bandaged head save his mouth, hastily reeling off the thoughts of random members of his squirrel audience like Derren Brown, for example.

Then there’s the collective thinking we can do.  Studies have shown that if you get a large enough group of people together and have them form a connection, they can begin to think alike.  Only simple things like all thinking of the same number etc., but it begs the question as to what else we can achieve.  After all, we all know the old noodle about us only being able to harness 10% of our brain’s potential.  What if we could harness more?  Somehow strengthen the brainwaves that form this connection with others?

We could reach conclusions that normally one mind couldn’t reach alone, such as solving complex mathematical equations or scientific theorem.  In fact some studies may have been conducted with results towards that effect, though I don’t know for certain, only a vague memory of something I might have read once.  The point is, get enough of us together with enough brainpower and we could start to pick up on the thoughts of other individuals.

This is a cool idea; maybe people would be able to help amnesiacs recover memories.  Use subtle, subconscious psychic connections (for want of a better term, as ‘communicating using the same neural wavelength’ isn’t as catchy) we could peek into the minds of others and recover memories that would otherwise be blocked to the patient.

Either these kinds of connections are or should be linked to Vladimir Vernadsky and Teilhard de Chardin’s noosphere theory.  Vernadsky theorises that there are three phases of development of the Earth.  The first is the geosphere, which is essentially the four original elements; earth, fire, wind and water.  Then comes the biosphere, which is of course all the biological life inhabiting Earth.  After that’s done sorting the men from the boys (too bad, dinosaurs) the noosphere emerges.

This is where I veer away from Vernadsky (who goes into harmony with elements through nuclear processing) and err on the side of de Chardin’s continuation.  He supposes that the noosphere is created through the interaction of human minds, a subsconscious neural connection that we all share coming to fruition.  He believes that as humanity strengthens this connection through our ever quickening creation of social networks – and by that I don’t mean Facebook, I mean making us more connected and reachable through advances in transportation and communication, so slightly about Facebook – the noosphere will expand in both strength and awareness, until eventually we essentially ascend to a new plane of existence where our thoughts are all intertwined with one another.  He calls this the Omega Point, otherwise known as “the goal of history”.

C. Lloyd Morgan, and earlier Henri Bergson, linked this with evolution.  He noticed that the most interesting changes in living things were not part of the natural process of evolution, and that rather than being gradual, evolution jumps every now and then in increasingly complex ways.  They also describe an emergent form of evolution called “cultural evolution”, which was sped up by the development of language to a point where cultural and biological evolution will meet in harmony.  This cultural evolution would of course be the noosphere, the elevation of our minds to a fully integrated, global hivemind.

Do excuse my language, but I’m going to discuss Scientology now.  To paraphrase somewhat, they believe along the lines that some dictator alien culled his galactic population by hurling them into a volcano on earth and created an atmospheric barrier to prevent their souls escaping into the cosmos.  They sought refuge in the closest animals around, which where primitive humans.  These souls are what give us the emotions we have today.  This is a loose recollection from what was shown in that South Park episode, but I think it covers the basics as far as I remember them.

Thing is, when you wipe away all the dictator-galactic-empire-population-cull bullshit and just focus on the “primitive humans being granted intelligence” aspect, it doesn’t seem entirely ridiculous.

Ok, so run with me on this one.

Biologically, we have a lot of things in common with other species on this planet.  But the way we think is so different to anything else.  We have a thirst for more of everything that no other animal has shown.  We always want to know more about everything, we always want to explore further, we always want to create more, build more, learn more.  We are never satisfied with our lot, as soon as we reach one thing we set our sights on something else.

Why?  Nobody knows.  We’re still looking.  What do you think the missing link is?  It was that trigger that caused us to veer off from the typical evolutionary path; that made us sentient.  Something happened that caused us to stop thinking like animals and start thinking intelligently, thinking intellectually.  And given that the way we think is unlike anything else on this planet, why can’t that be because it isn’t from this planet?

What is a soul?  Whatever it is, popular theory believes only we have one, nothing else.  Some people believe pets do, but we’ll get on to that later.  Either way, you have to admit that it’s difficult to entirely brush it off as hokum.  There is something special about us, everybody has such a unique personality, such brilliantly different, complex and incredible minds.  Our memories, our loves, our hates, our relationships with others, our relationships with ourselves, our emotions; it is so hard to accept that these are just electrical signals and chemicals buzzing about your head.  It’s easy to believe, yes, science has well and truly established the truth in it.  But just seems like there has to be something more to it than that, there has to be something that makes us us.

This is where my credibility will appear to go out of the window, if it hasn’t done already, but keep reading and bear with me.

So, in the simplest possible terms because I honestly have no idea what the details could ever possibly be, and because I want to make sure what I say is clear and succinct – our lives are a test of some kind.  Some extra-terrestrial initiation process for something, I have no idea.  It seems crazy, it probably is.  But the reason I’m writing it down is, despite how ridiculous it sounds, it actually would explain some things.

Below I’ll talk about the explanations.  If I type anything like ‘this’, you can take those marks to mean ‘for want of a better term’.

1)      We have souls
-        Our ‘soul’, whatever it may be and whatever it may have come from, is placed into a ‘blank’ human being to form a ‘person’
-        This person then goes about their life as any normal person does, growing up, becoming a douchebag, working for 50 years and then dying
-        How they ‘performed’ is measured upon death, and a reward or punishment is given, ranging in severity
-        Throughout this life, obviously, the person has no idea they are an ‘alien soul’ in a human body; all their memories are ‘blocked’
2)      Heaven and Hell
-        Remember when I was talking about our ability in large groups to think alike?
-        Remember when I thought maybe sub-conscious connections like that could, with the right amount of people and/or brainpower, gain access to memories that would otherwise be blocked?
-        Individually, as I said in point 1, we have no idea we’re really alien souls; the memories are blocked
-        However, when we grew in number and were all emotionally connected through the simple fact that we’re the same species, maybe we started to subconsciously access memories from others
-        This would of course be emergence of the noosphere – all human minds connected to one another, sharing thoughts and ideas
-        Obviously the noosphere would have been weak during the rise of religion, as there were far fewer humans then and we hadn’t harnessed the brainpower
-        However, we may have had enough of a connection for individuals to begin to access the idea of the reward/punishment we get when our experience as a human ends, as also mentioned in point 1
-        As we only had the basic structure of this idea, we had to fill in the gaps with our own interpretation
-        Thus the ideas of Heaven and Hell were created
3)      Free will
-        Simple really
-        We can do what we want because this is a test of character
4)      Our place
-        As I said earlier, we don’t seem to have a place on this planet
-        While everything else adds to the lifecycle of the ecosystem, we just run rampant across the globe in a wave of destruction and industry
-        This is because we don’t belong on Earth; it’s just a testing ground to us, so we blindly do whatever damage to it that we want because at the very very depths of our minds there is the slightest awareness of what we really are

A further point Megan raised was that of re-incarnation.  A surprising number of people have been said to recall ‘past lives’ that they lived.  There was a BBC television programme a few weeks ago about a boy who said he lived a past life with a family in Wales.  He spoke about his ‘other’ parents and ‘other’ life quite frequently and in impressive detail.  The family decided to take a trip to Wales to where the boy said he lived, and what they found seemed to back up a lot of what he had said, particularly the house he used to live in.

Reincarnation speaks a lot of living past or future lives as animals, and we thought this actually could stack up with the rest of the theory.  While generally animals, especially when wild, seem quite autonomous and just going about doing standard animal stuff, we do tend to notice characteristics in them, especially our pets.  Sometimes we even liken them to things we as people do.  And a lot of people are of the view that if we have souls, then our pets must do too.  All dogs go to heaven.

It’s generally believed or known, I’m not sure, that cats and dogs found humans rather than the other way around.  They came to us choosing to be domesticated.  As we began to share the same space as them and form a connection through proximity, maybe they began to form part of the noosphere too, or at least became a part of our souls’ ‘reincarnation field’ (in other words, while their minds might not have been complex enough to form part of the noosphere, some souls upon death may have inhabited pets if there wasn’t a human body available – and you can count this entire bracket as ‘for want of a better term’). 

Maybe that’s why we see aspects of human personalities in them, and why their behaviour has begun to change with domestication.  Maybe that’s secretly what ‘domestication’ means – adding another species to the field of reincarnation.

Perhaps this means, then, that this is more than a test, maybe it is a game or challenge where more players continue to join, and when you die you simply re-spawn into another human.  Or maybe it is a test but a continual one, where the participants keep going until the world is destroyed or some other kind of conclusion is reached.  Maybe that conclusion is the forming of the noosphere.  A completely seamless network of 6 billion+ minds working together – that’s a lot of processing power.  Maybe Earth is just one planet in thousands making the universe’s most powerful computer chips.


Whatever the meaning of life is, nobody is even close to knowing it, so it would be unfair to debunk this theory purely due to how ridiculous it sounds to us.  I’m sure I must sound like some kind of conspiracy nut, but I do a lot of thinking so some of it’s bound to end up outlandish.  But if this does turn out to be just some crazy nonsense, I could at least put it forward as a religion.

No comments: